Evidence Hub

Oxygen administration during surgery and postoperative organ injury: observational cohort study

D. McIlroy, Matthew S. Shotwell, Marcos G. Lopez, Michelle T. Vaughn, J. Olsen, C. Hennessy, J. Wanderer, M. Semler et al.

British medical journal, 2022

350 participants · 42 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective To examine whether supraphysiological oxygen administration during surgery is associated with lower or higher postoperative kidney, heart, and lung injury. Design Observational cohort study. Setting 42 medical centers across the United States participating in the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group data registry. Participants Adult patients undergoing surgical procedures ≥120 minutes’ duration with general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation who were admitted to hospital after surgery between January 2016 and November 2018. Intervention Supraphysiological oxygen administration, defined as the area under the curve of the fraction of inspired oxygen above air (21%) during minutes when the hemoglobin oxygen saturation was greater than 92%. Main outcomes Primary endpoints were acute kidney injury defined using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, myocardial injury defined as serum troponin >0.04 ng/mL within 72 hours of surgery, and lung injury defined using international classification of diseases hospital discharge diagnosis codes. Results The cohort comprised 350 647 patients with median age 59 years (interquartile range 46-69 years), 180 546 women (51.5%), and median duration of surgery 205 minutes (interquartile range 158-279 minutes). Acute kidney injury was diagnosed in 19 207 of 297 554 patients (6.5%), myocardial injury in 8972 of 320 527 (2.8%), and lung injury in 13 789 of 312 161 (4.4%). The median fraction of inspired oxygen…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 350 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free