Evidence Hub

Association of sexual dysfunctions according to DSM-5 criteria with structural brain differences in women and men from the Hamburg City Health Study

Thula U. Koops, Mirjam Christina Reidick, Leonie Ascone, Michail Mordvintsev, Jürgen Gallinat, Peer Briken, Simone Kühn

Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 2026

32 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction Sexual dysfunctions are prevalent public health issues with understudied neurobiological correlates. This study explores structural brain differences in individuals with DSM-5 sexual dysfunctions vs. matched controls.Methods This cross-sectional study employed voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to analyse structural brain scans from the Hamburg City Health Study. Participants with erectile disorder (ED; n = 20), premature ejaculation (PE; n = 20), genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD; n = 8), and female sexual interest/arousal disorder (FSIAD; n = 32) were compared with matched controls (n = 40,40,24,32, respectively). Whole-brain VBM analyses used SPM12 and CAT12. Statistical parametric maps were thresholded at uncorrected voxel-level (p < .001) and false discovery rate (FDR) correction (p_FDR < .05).Results ED showed clusters in right putamen with reduced rGMV and left postcentral gyrus with higher rGMV. PE displayed lower rGMV in cerebellar lobe VI/Crus I and left superior/medial temporal gyrus. GPPPD exhibited higher rGMV in right middle frontal gyrus. FSIAD showed no differences. No clusters survived FDR correction, underscoring the exploratory and hypothesis-generating nature of the reported findings.Conclusions This study identifies potential associations between sexual dysfunctions and structural brain differences in regions related to sexual function, arousal, inhibition, motor coordination, and pain processing. Results require cautious…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 32 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free