Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and safety of combining SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Colombijn JMT, de Leijer JF, Visseren FLJ, Verhaar MC, van Raalte DH, Sattar N, Vernooij RWM, van Sloten TT

Diabetologia, 2026

1,164,774 participants

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) reduce cardiorenal risk in type 2 diabetes. However, the effect of combining these drugs remains uncertain. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the potential effectiveness and safety of combination therapy compared with monotherapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

METHOD: We systematically searched PubMed and Embase from inception to 1 May 2025 for cohort studies comparing the effect of combination therapy with SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 RA monotherapy on (cardiovascular) mortality and cardiovascular or kidney endpoints in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Studies enrolling individuals with type 1 diabetes or a maximum follow-up of less than 1 year were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalisation for heart failure, a kidney composite endpoint and serious adverse events. Risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% CIs were pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS: We included 18 cohort studies (1,164,774 participants). In cohort studies, combination therapy was associated with a lower risk of MACE (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.43, 0.71]; low certainty of evidence) and the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,164,774 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free