Evidence Hub

A Network Meta-Analysis of Pharmacological Treatments for Gastric Mucosal Protection in Artificial Ulcers following Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of the Stomach

Chen Z, Zhan S, Yu H

Pharmacology, 2026

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) monotherapy is standard for artificial ulcer healing after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection, but evidence on the efficacy of PPI combined with gastric mucosal protectants remains inconclusive. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of 10 mucosal protectants combined with PPIs.

METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov until January 2025. Included were 20 randomized controlled trials (n = 2,000) comparing PPI monotherapy versus PPI combined with protectants (e.g., rebamipide, ecabet, polaprezinc) or active controls. Primary outcomes included ulcer area reduction, healing rates (4/8 weeks), longest ulcer diameter, and bleeding risk. Frequentist random-effects models synthesized risk ratios (RRs) and MDs with 95% CIs. Consistency was evaluated using design-by-treatment interaction and node splitting. Risk of bias (RoB 2.0) was assessed at the outcome level. Certainty of evidence was graded with GRADE.

RESULTS: Bismuth subcitrate-magnesium granules (BMG) + PPI most effectively reduced 4-week ulcer area (MD: -62.50 mm2, 95% CI: -87.25 to -37.75 vs. PPI; SUCRA = 94%). Ecabet sodium (EB) + PPI achieved the highest 8-week healing rate (RR: 7.71, 95% CI: 5.52-9.91). Hydrotalcite (HT) + PPI best reduced ulcer diameter (MD: -1.87 mm), while teprenone (TN) + PPI optimally prevented bleeding (RR: -3.41, 95% CI: -5.43 to -1.38). Rebamipide + PPI showed…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free