Evidence Hub

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships and selection of drug combinations for tuberculosis

Muliaditan M, Della Pasqua O

British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021

Abstract

AIMS: Despite evidence of the efficacy of anti-tubercular drug regimens in clinical practice, the rationale underpinning the selection of doses and companion drugs for combination therapy remains empirical. Novel methods are needed to optimise the antibacterial activity in combination therapies. A drug-disease modelling framework for rational selection of dose and drug combinations in tuberculosis is presented here.

METHODS: A model-based meta-analysis was performed to assess the antibacterial activity of different combinations in infected mice. Data retrieved from the published literature were analysed using a two-state bacterial growth dynamics model, including fast- and slow-growing bacterial populations. The contribution of each drug to the overall antibacterial activity of the combination was parameterised as relative change to the potency of the backbone drug (EC50 -F and/or EC50 -S). Rifampicin and bedaquiline were selected as paradigm drugs to evaluate the predictive performance of the modelling approach.

RESULTS: Pyrazinamide increased the potency (EC50 -F and EC50 -S) of rifampicin (RZ) and bedaquiline (BZ) by almost two-fold. By contrast, pretomanid and isoniazid were found to worsen the antibacterial activity of BZ and RZ, respectively. Following extrapolation of in vivo pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships, the dose of rifampicin showing maximum bactericidal effect in tuberculosis patients was predicted to be 70 mg·kg-1 when given in combination with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free