Evidence Hub

Combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis of phase 3 trials

Li R, Zhang X, Shen J

BMC cancer, 2025

2,334 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The integration of immunotherapy with chemotherapy (CT) has emerged as a major focus of clinical research in recent years for patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC). Recent phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported heterogeneous outcomes, prompting ongoing debate within the oncology community. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combined approach through a meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified phase 3 RCTs comparing first-line immunotherapy plus CT versus CT alone in advanced or recurrent EC. Meta-analyses were performed to pool hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), odds ratios (ORs) for objective response rate (ORR), and relative risks (RRs) for adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Four phase 3 RCTs (n = 2,334) met eligibility criteria. The combination therapy significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.47–0.78), OS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.65–0.87), and ORR (OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.17–1.73) compared to CT alone. While a modest increase in grade 3–5 AEs (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.03–1.20) was observed with combination therapy, there was no significant rise in serious AEs. Subgroup analyses revealed enhanced survival benefits in patients with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumors, PD-L1-positive tumors, and recurrent disease. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates that combining immunotherapy with CT as first-line treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,334 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free