Evidence Hub

Combined treatments based on interventional therapy improve the prognosis of patients with HCC: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses

Yuan X, Jing L, Zhou J, Dong C, Zhang P

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of evidence on interventional therapies-alone or in combination-for improving the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS: We systematically analyzed 127 meta-analyses (472 outcomes) retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane (to November 2024) and assessed quality using AMSTAR and GRADE.

RESULTS: High-quality evidence indicated that transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with multimodal therapies significantly improved survival and tumor response versus monotherapy. TACE plus lenvatinib enhanced objective response rate (ORR; odds ratio [OR] = 3.58, 95 % CI 2.45-5.24) and overall survival (OS; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.47, 95 % CI 0.35-0.62). TACE plus sorafenib improved ORR (relative risk [RR] = 1.35, 95 % CI 1.24-1.48), and TACE plus apatinib improved 1-year survival (OR = 2.28, 95 % CI 1.44-3.62). Local adjuncts such as 125I seeds (3-year OS: OR = 3.13, 95 % CI 1.68-5.83) and external beam radiotherapy (1-year mortality: RR = 0.51, 95 % CI 0.41-0.62) further amplified benefits. Immunotherapy combinations (TACE + thalidomide) increased ORR (OR = 1.84, 95 % CI 1.34-2.52) and disease control rate (OR = 2.68, 95 % CI 1.80-3.99). However, TACE plus multi-kinase inhibitors (MKIs) raised serious adverse events by 41 % (RR = 1.41, 95 % CI 1.25-1.59). Although most outcomes (87.5 %) were graded low or very low quality due to heterogeneity and publication bias.

CONCLUSION: Combination strategies based on…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free