Evidence Hub

Combining the benefits of tele-rehabilitation and virtual reality-based balance training: a systematic review on feasibility and effectiveness

Schröder J, van Criekinge T, Embrechts E, Celis X, Van Schuppen J, Truijen S, Saeys W

Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology, 2019

120 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: A motivational surrounding is desirable in stroke rehabilitation considering the need to train repetitively to improve balance, even after discharge from rehabilitation facilities. This review aims to investigate whether it is feasible to combine virtual reality (VR) which allows exercising in game-like environments with tele-rehabilitation in a community-dwelling stroke population.

METHODS: Literature searches were conducted in five databases, for example, PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-RCT investigating feasibility and effectiveness of VR-based tele-rehabilitation were included. Based on the risk of bias and study design, methodological quality is ranked according to the GRADE guidelines.

RESULTS: Seven studies (n = 120) were included, of which four are RCTs. Evidence regarding therapy adherence and perceived enjoyment of VR, as well as a cost-benefit of tele-rehabilitation emphasizes feasibility. Equal effects are reported comparing this approach to a therapist-supervised intervention in the clinical setting on balance and functional mobility.

CONCLUSIONS: Tele-rehabilitation could be a promising tool to overcome burdens that restrict accessibility to rehabilitation in the future. VR can increase motivation allowing longer and more training sessions in community-dwelling stroke survivors. Therefore, combining the benefits of both approaches seems convenient. Although evidence is still sparse, functional improvements…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free