Evidence Hub

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Determination of Less Frequently Isolated Legionella Species by Broth and Agar Dilution

Farley C, Price A, Sewell M, Barton R, Portal EAR, Boostrom I, Day J, Afshar B et al.

Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Infections caused by Legionella species are primarily associated with Legionella pneumophila, but non-pneumophila species are increasingly implicated in human disease. Despite this, antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data for non-pneumophila species remain scarce, and standardised testing protocols or resistance thresholds have not been established. This study aimed to address this gap by evaluating and comparing AST performance for non-pneumophila Legionella species relative to L. pneumophila using three methodologies. Methods: AST was conducted on 89 Legionella isolates using LASARUS agar dilution, buffered yeast extract broth microdilution (BYE-BMD), and BCYE-α agar dilution, against ampicillin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, doxycycline, levofloxacin, and rifampicin. Growth performance and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were assessed after a 96 h incubation. Results: MIC profiles were obtained using LASARUS and BYE-BMD for 53.9% and 93.3% of isolates, respectively. While L. pneumophila reached sufficient turbidity in BYE-BMD after a 48 h incubation, non-pneumophila species required an extended incubation (72-96 h). Non-pneumophila species displayed broader MIC ranges against azithromycin (0.016-1 mg/L) and levofloxacin (0.016-0.25 mg/L), but a narrower rifampicin range (≤0.0005-0.032 mg/L) relative to L. pneumophila. L. longbeachae exhibited a higher MIC50 for rifampicin despite overlapping susceptibility ranges across all species…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free