Evidence Hub

Evaluation of a new solid formulation of calcium and vitamin D in institutionalized elderly subjects. A randomized comparative trial versus separate administration of both constituents

Sebert JL, Garabedian M, Chauvenet M, Maamer M, Agbomson F, Brazier M

Revue du rhumatisme (English ed.), 1995

91 participants

Abstract

Supplementation with 800 IU of vitamin D and 1 g of calcium each day is recommended in institutionalized elderly subjects to prevent secondary hyperparathyroidism and its adverse skeletal effects. An original formulation (IDEOS) combining vitamin D and calcium has been developed for use in this end. The aim of this study was to determine whether administration of this association, of which each tablet contains 500 mg calcium and 400 IU vitamin D3, produces the same beneficial effects on laboratory parameters as separate administration of both active agents. A multicenter randomized study was conducted in 91 elderly institutionalized subjects (mean age 83.1 years) who had vitamin D deficiency [25-(OH)D < 6 ng/ml] without severe renal failure. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Treatment duration was six months. One group (G1, n = 46) received one tablet of the new formulation twice daily. The other (G2, n = 45) received 8 drops of vitamin D3 (800 IU/day) and one calcium carbonate 500 mg tablet twice daily. Blood tests were carried out at inclusion and after three and six months of treatment. In group G1, plasma 25-(OH)D levels increased from 2.6 ng/ml at inclusion to 14.6 ng/ml at month 6 (p < 0.001), and iPTH fell from 63.2 pg/ml at inclusion to 33.8 pg/ml at month 6 (p < 0.001). In group G2, 25-(OH)D rose from 2.8 ng/ml at inclusion to 13.5 ng/ml at month 6 (p < 0.001), and iPTH fell from 55.4 pg/ml at inclusion to 32.5 pg/ml at month 6 (p <…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 91 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free