Evidence Hub

Fenoterol-ipratropium nebulization in infants with obstructive bronchial syndrome

Calvo M, Grob K, Herrmann M, Marín F

Revista chilena de pediatria, 1990

120 participants

Abstract

A double blind prospective study was done in 120 infants with acute obstructive bronchial disease. One half of them received combined fenoterol-ipratropium solution by inhalation in three different dose schedules while the other half was given inhalation normal saline solution for comparative purposes. Statistical analysis showed a significant difference in favor of fenoterol-ipratropium treatment over controls as to severity of bronchial obstruction, days of recovery and the need of additional bronchodilator drugs. However, no significant differences in the response of these parameters were noted among patients receiving different dose schedules of fenoterol-ipratropium. The combination of fenoterol-ipratropium showed a beneficial bronchodilator effect in patients with acute obstructive bronchial disease.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 120 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free