Evidence Hub

Combination chemotherapy for advanced adenocarcinoma of the lung. A review

Sørensen JB, Hansen HH

Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 1988

Abstract

Combination chemotherapy has been used widely in the treatment of inoperable adenocarcinoma of the lung (ACL), but without uniform success. This review summarizes current knowledge of combination chemotherapy in ACL, with the aim of establishing critical background material for future studies. Not all the numerous combinations applied in non-randomized studies have produced response rates above 20% when evaluated in randomized trials. This holds true for the following regimens: cyclophosphamide + lomustine + methotrexate (response rates 14%-38%), hexamethylmelamine + doxorubicin + methotrexate (13%-32%), methotrexate + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide + lomustine (13%-24%), cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + cisplatin (0-36%), cyclophosphamide + bleomycin + cisplatin (20%), mitomycin C + vinblastine + cisplatin (26%-33%), cyclophosphamide + doxorubicin + etoposide + cisplatin (29%) and vindesine + cisplatin (33%). None of these combinations has been shown to be clearly superior to single-agent treatment. Nor has any specific regimen been shown to have clear advantages over other active combination chemotherapy regimens or over the sequential administration of either single agents or combined treatments. The prognosis for patients with inoperable ACL remains dismal. None of the studies considered in this review revealed median survival times exceeding 47 weeks. High priority should therefore be given to the identification of new compounds with significant activity against ACL.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free