Evidence Hub

Phase II study of chidamide in combination with cisplatin in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Meng Y, Jin J, Gong C, Miao H, Tao Z, Li T, Cao J, Wang L et al.

Annals of palliative medicine, 2021

15 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Platinum-based regimens are the mainstay treatments for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Preclinical studies have shown that the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor chidamide induced antitumor effects in TNBC, and chidamide plus chemotherapy was shown to be tolerable in several malignancies. This study sought to investigate the efficacy and safety of a combination treatment of chidamide and cisplatin in metastatic TNBC patients.

METHODS: In this phase II, single-arm study, women with metastatic TNBC were administered chidamide (20 mg twice weekly for 2 weeks on a 21-day cycle) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on a 21-day cycle). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1. The severity of adverse events was measured by the CTCAE 4.03.

RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 15 were available for evaluation. In these 15 patients, confirmed objective responses were seen in 4 patients [26.67%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.9%, 51.95%]. The ORRs did not meet the predefined criteria (of a response by at least 5 of the 15 patients); thus, the study remained at stage I. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.8 weeks; 4 patients had a PFS of >25 weeks. In relation to the treatment-related AEs ≥ grade 3, >2 patients had neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (20%), leucopenia (20%), and vomiting (20%).

CONCLUSIONS: The addition of chidamide did not improve the efficacy of cisplatin in the first-line…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free