Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant capecitabine and pembrolizumab in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer after standard neo-/adjuvant chemotherapy: A meta-analysis of phase III studies

Ben Kridis W, Khanfir A

Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2026

3,133 participants

Abstract

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer with high recurrence rates and poor prognosis. Capecitabine and pembrolizumab are emerging therapies aimed at improving survival outcomes in early-stage TNBC. This meta-analysis compares the efficacy of capecitabine and pembrolizumab in improving disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in early-stage TNBC.MethodsA systematic literature search identified four major randomized controlled trials (RCTs): CREATE-X, GEICAM, KEYNOTE-522, and SYSUCC-001. These studies investigated the efficacy of capecitabine and pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in early-stage TNBC patients. Data on DFS and OS were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.ResultsThe pooled analysis included 3133 participants across four trials. For OS, pembrolizumab demonstrated a significant benefit with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.64-0.79), indicating a 34% reduction in the risk of death. Capecitabine showed mixed results across studies, with a pooled HR of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.55-1.03). The pooled HR across these studies, calculated using a random-effects model, was found to be 0.69 (95% CI: 0.64 to 0.79). For DFS, pembrolizumab provided a consistent benefit (HR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.93), while capecitabine resulted in a significant reduction in recurrence risk (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52-0.88).ConclusionThis meta-analysis demonstrates that pembrolizumab…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,133 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free