Evidence Hub

Clindamycin Phosphate 1.2%/Adapalene 0.15%/ Benzoyl Peroxide 3.1% Gel for Moderate-to-Severe Acne: A Pooled Analysis by Age

Kircik LH, Harper JC, Baldwin H, Eichenfield LF, Tanghetti EA, Graber E, Woolery-Lloyd HC, Guenin E et al.

Journal of drugs in dermatology : JDD, 2025

515 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acne pathophysiology and presentation may differ between pediatric/adolescent/young adult (9-24 years) and adult (≥25 years) patients. Fixed-dose clindamycin phosphate 1.2%/adapalene 0.15%/benzoyl peroxide 3.1% (CAB) gel demonstrated superior efficacy to vehicle and component dyads with good safety/tolerability in 3 clinical trials of acne. This post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy/safety of CAB in pediatric/adolescent/young adult ("younger") vs adult participants.

METHODS: In one phase 2 (NCT03170388) and two phase 3 (NCT04214652, NCT04214639) trials, participants aged greater than or equal to 9 years with moderate-to-severe acne were randomized to once-daily CAB or vehicle gel. Pooled data were analyzed for participants grouped by age: younger (9-24 years; n=515) and adult (greater than or equal to 25 years; n=142). Endpoints included the percentage of participants achieving treatment success (greater than or equal to 2-grade reduction from baseline in Evaluator's Global Severity Score and clear/almost clear skin) and least squares mean percent change from baseline in inflammatory/noninflammatory lesions at week 12. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated throughout.

RESULTS: At week 12, approximately half of CAB-treated participants in both age groups achieved treatment success (9-24: 50.6%; greater than or equal to 25: 49.0%) vs less than one-fourth with vehicle (15.7%; 20.6%; P<0.01, both). Across groups, CAB yielded >70% reductions…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 515 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free