Evidence Hub

Genotype-dependent response to combined levodopa/benserazide and trihexyphenidyl in pediatric genetic dystonia

Zhou X, Li Y, Luo X, He Z, Liu M, Li P

Brain & development, 2026

36 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genetic etiologies underlie a substantial proportion of pediatric dystonia, but whether treatment response to combined dopaminergic and anticholinergic therapy varies by genotype remains unknown.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 36 children with genetically confirmed dystonia, classified into three subgroups: PANK2 (n = 7), channelopathies (SCN1A/SCN2A/SCN3A/SCN1B, KCNQ2; n = 6), and other monogenic etiologies (n = 23; 19 distinct genes). All received levodopa/benserazide and trihexyphenidyl combination therapy for 16 weeks. Outcomes included Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale (BADS), Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88), Quality of Upper Extremity Skills Test (QUEST), and Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire (CP-QOL).

RESULTS: Treatment response was genotype-dependent. PANK2 patients showed excellent improvement (ΔBADS -6.6 ± 3.0; ΔGMFM-88 + 49.6 ± 45.8). Other monogenic patients showed moderate improvement comparable to our cerebral palsy cohort (ΔBADS -6.1 ± 1.9; ΔGMFM-88 + 32.2 ± 26.5). Channelopathy patients derived minimal benefit (ΔBADS -3.5 ± 1.2; ΔGMFM-88 + 6.2 ± 2.9; p < 0.001 compared to both other groups). All six patients with status dystonicus (all in the other monogenic group) responded excellently. Adverse event rates were comparable across groups (p = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS: Genotype determines treatment response to levodopa/benserazide and trihexyphenidyl in pediatric genetic dystonia. PANK2 and most other monogenic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 36 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free