Evidence Hub

Inflammatory biomarkers and nanotechnology: new insights in pancreatic cancer early detection

Caputo D, Quagliarini E, Coppola A, La Vaccara V, Marmiroli B, Sartori B, Caracciolo G, Pozzi D

International journal of surgery (London, England), 2023

24 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Poor prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is mainly due to the lack of effective early-stage detection strategies. Even though the link between inflammation and PDAC has been demonstrated and inflammatory biomarkers proved their efficacy in predicting several tumours, to date they have a role only in assessing PDAC prognosis. Recently, the studies of interactions between nanosystems and easily collectable biological fluids, alone or coupled with standard laboratory tests, have proven useful in facilitating PDAC diagnosis. Notably, tests based on magnetic levitation (MagLev) of biocoronated nanosystems have demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy in compliance with the criteria stated by WHO. Herein, the author developed a synergistic analysis that combines a user-friendly MagLev-based approach and common inflammatory biomarkers for discriminating PDAC subjects from healthy ones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Plasma samples from 24 PDAC subjects and 22 non-oncological patients have been collected and let to interact with graphene oxide nanosheets.Biomolecular corona formed around graphene oxide nanosheets have been immersed in a Maglev platform to study the levitation profiles.Inflammatory biomarkers such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived-NLR (dNLR), and platelet to lymphocyte ratio have been calculated and combined with results obtained by the MagLev platform.

RESULTS: MagLev profiles resulted significantly different between non-oncological…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free