Evidence Hub

The role of combining interim and final analysis by using endoscopic and radiologic methods in total neoadjuvant treatment

Erozkan K, Liska D, Oktem A, Alipouriani A, Schabl L, Valente MA, Miller JA, Purysko AS et al.

American journal of surgery, 2025

208 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We aim to compare the relative performance of flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and their combinations during interim (i) and final (f) analysis to evaluate concordance with complete response (CR) following total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) in rectal cancer.

METHOD: Patients who opted TNT and underwent restaging with FS and MRI between 2015 and 2022 were evaluated. Concordance between the assessment methods and CR was analyzed using the weighted-κ test.

RESULTS: A cohort comprising 208 patients revealed CR rate of 42.3 ​%. When evaluating individual methods, fFS alone demonstrated the most heightened sensitivity (68.2 ​%) for CR detection, with a moderate level of concordance (κ ​= ​0.46). Only the combinations of iFS-fFS and fFS-fMRI reached a comparable level of concordance to that achievable by fFS alone.

CONCLUSION: Among the available diagnostic tools, the combination of final MRI and FS still appears to offer the highest concordance with CR, with relatively higher sensitivity. Additionally, interim MRI may not add significant clinical value and could be omitted.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 208 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free