Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of HIPEC combined with PD-1 and SOX chemotherapy for gastric or oesophagogastric junctional cancer with peritoneal metastasis (HISTORIA): protocol for a prospective, multicentre, single-arm, phase II study

Zhang Y, Li F, Liu H, Li P, Li Q, Wang L, Zhang D, Wu H et al.

BMJ open, 2025

50 participants

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Despite advances in diagnostics, many patients with gastric cancer (GC) or oesophagogastric junction cancer present with advanced disease, most commonly peritoneal metastasis (PM), which conveys a poor prognosis. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) therapy have each shown promise in GC. We describe the protocol for a study evaluating the efficacy and safety of combining HIPEC with the anti-PD-1 antibody tislelizumab and SOX (oxaliplatin+S-1) chemotherapy in patients with GC/oesophagogastric junction cancer and PM.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, single-arm, phase II trial conducted at 13 high-volume tertiary referral hospitals across China. We will enrol 50 adults (18-75 years) with histologically confirmed GC/oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and PM diagnosed by laparoscopy. Participants will receive one laparoscopy-guided HIPEC cycle (paclitaxel, total dose: 175 mg/m2, 3000 mL of physiological saline at 43°C for 60 min, inflow rate 1.5 L/min, 10 min physiological saline preconditioning at 41°C) followed-after a 3-week interval-by up to three 3-week cycles of tislelizumab 200 mg plus SOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² and S-1 dose-escalated by body surface area). HER2-positive patients will also receive trastuzumab.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT: 1-year overall survival. Secondary endpoints: 1-year progression-free survival, completeness of Cytoreduction Score and objective response rate. Follow-up…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 50 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free