Evidence Hub

Predicting prognosis of primary pontine hemorrhage using CT image and deep learning

Wang S, Chen F, Zhang M, Zhao X, Wen L, Wu W, Wu S, Li Z et al.

NeuroImage. Clinical, 2022

219 participants

Abstract

Prognosis of primary pontine hemorrhage (PPH) is important for treatment planning and patient management. However, only few clinical factors were reported to have prognostic value to PPH. Here, we propose a deep learning (DL) model that mines high-dimensional prognostic information from computed tomography (CT) images and combines clinical factors for predicting individualized prognosis of PPH. We proposed a multi-task DL model to learn high-dimensional CT features of hematoma and perihematomal areas for predicting the risk of 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and 90-day functional outcome of PPH simultaneously. We further explored the combination of the DL model and clinical factors by building a combined model. All the models were trained in a training cohort (n = 219) and tested in an independent testing cohort (n = 35). The DL model achieved area under the curve (AUC) of 0.886, 0.886, and 0.759 in predicting 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality and 90-day functional outcome of PPH in the independent testing cohort, which improved over the previously reported new PPH score and the clinical model. When combining the DL model and clinical factors, the combined model achieved improved performance (AUC = 0.920, 0.941, and 0.894), indicating that DL model mines CT information that complements clinical factors. Through DL visualization technique, we found that the internal structure of hematoma and its expansion to perihematomal regions are important for predicting the prognosis…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 219 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free