Evidence Hub

Development and multicenter external validation of an intratumoral and peritumoral ultrasound-based radiomics model for preoperative prediction of HER2 status in IHC 2 + breast cancer

Wang J, Qu N, Liu C, Lin Y, Cui Y, Cao X

European journal of medical research, 2025

308 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status can guide eligibility for HER2-targeted therapy in breast cancer. We aimed to develop and externally validate a nomogram that combines ultrasound (US) radiomics features from intratumoral and peritumoral regions with clinical variables to predict HER2 status in patients with IHC 2 + breast cancer.

METHODS: We retrospectively included 440 IHC 2 + breast cancers with FISH results and randomly split them into a training cohort (n = 308) and an internal testing cohort (n = 132). Two independent cohorts provided external validation (pooled, n = 153; single center, n = 102). Radiomics features were extracted from the intratumoral region (ITR), peritumoral region (PTR) at 1/3/5 mm, and combined intratumoral and peritumoral region (IPTR) on 2D US. The models were trained with mRMR and LASSO-regularized logistic regression. A Rad-score was derived and combined with key clinical variables to build a nomogram. Performance was assessed with the AUC, calibration curves, and DCA.

RESULTS: The combined model using the IPTR3 Rad-score achieved AUCs of 0.821 (95% CI 0.772-0.869), 0.828 (95% CI 0.756-0.900), 0.774 (95% CI 0.697-0.851), and 0.803 (95% CI 0.699-0.906) in the training, internal testing, external validation 1, and external validation 2 cohorts, respectively. The calibration curves indicated good agreement. DCA showed greater net benefit than the clinical or radiomics model across most…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 308 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free