Evidence Hub

Alternating combination chemotherapy does not delay development of refractoriness in myeloma

Osby E, Beksac M, Reizenstein P

Anticancer research, 1986

Abstract

Sixty-seven patients with stage II and III myeloma were subjected to 3 consecutive prospective phase II studies. Nineteen patients had received melphalan - prednisolone (melphalan group), 17 cyclophosphamide - vincristine - prednisolone (cyclophosphamide group) and 22 alternating combinations of 7 cytostatics and prednisolone (alternating group). Nine patients were unevaluable. The median time until response was achieved was 5, 5 and 3 months respectively. The purpose of the study was to see if combination or alternating combination chemotherapy can delay the appearance of refractoriness. Patients were regarded as refractory after progression, which was defined as advance from stage II to stage III, and, in stage III as an increase of the monoclonal serum protein of more than 25% and/or the monoclonal urine protein of more than 100% despite continued treatment. Refractoriness was not delayed by alternating combination treatment. Thirty per cent of the patients became refractory after 10 months of response in the melphalan group and after 11 months in the cyclophosphamide and the alternating chemotherapy groups. The results remained after stratification for stage.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free