Evidence Hub

CT-based conventional radiomics and quantification of intratumoral heterogeneity for predicting benign and malignant renal lesions

Yu S, Yang Y, Wang Z, Zheng H, Cui J, Zhan Y, Liu J, Li P et al.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the increasing incidence of renal lesions, pretreatment differentiation between benign and malignant lesions is crucial for optimized management. This study aimed to develop a machine learning model utilizing radiomic features extracted from various regions of interest (ROIs), intratumoral ecological diversity features, and clinical factors to classify renal lesions.

METHODS: CT images (arterial phase) of 1,795 renal lesions with confirmed pathology from three hospital sites were split into development (1184, 66%) and test (611, 34%) cohorts by surgery date. Conventional radiomic features were extracted from eight ROIs of arterial phase images. Intratumoral ecological diversity features were derived from intratumoral subregions. The combined model incorporating these features with clinical factors was developed, and its performance was compared with radiologists' interpretation.

RESULTS: Combining intratumoral and peritumoral radiomic features, along with ecological diversity features yielded the highest AUC of 0.929 among all combinations of features extracted from CT scans. After incorporating clinical factors into the features extracted from CT images, our combined model outperformed the interpretation of radiologists in the whole (AUC = 0.946 vs 0.823, P < 0.001) and small renal lesion (AUC = 0.935 vs 0.745, P < 0.001) test cohorts. Furthermore, the combined model exhibited favorable concordance and provided the highest net benefit across threshold…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free