Evidence Hub

The combined tumor-nodal glycolytic entropy improves survival stratification in nonsmall cell lung cancer with locoregional disease

Chen YH, Lue KH, Chu SC, Chang BS, Lin CB

Nuclear medicine communications, 2023

94 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether combining primary tumor and metastatic nodal glycolytic heterogeneity on 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET ( 18 F-FDG PET) improves prognostic prediction in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with locoregional disease.

METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 18 F-FDG PET-derived features from 94 patients who had undergone curative treatments for regional nodal metastatic NSCLC. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. We used the independent prognosticators to construct models to predict survival.

RESULTS: Combined entropy (entropy derived from the combination of the primary tumor and metastatic nodes) and age independently predicted OS (both P = 0.008) and PFS ( P = 0.007 and 0.050, respectively). At the same time, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status was another independent risk factor for unfavorable OS ( P = 0.026). Our combined entropy-based models outperformed the traditional staging system (c-index = 0.725 vs. 0.540, P < 0.001 for OS; c-index = 0.638 vs. 0.511, P = 0.003 for PFS) and still showed prognostic value in subgroups according to sex, histopathology, and different initial curative treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION: Combined primary tumor-nodal glycolytic heterogeneity independently predicted survival outcomes. In combination with clinical risk factors, our models provide better survival predictions and may enable tailored treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 94 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free