Evidence Hub

Retrospective study of S-1 versus tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Shibahara K, Yamamoto M, Kakeji Y, Sakata H, Maehara Y

Anticancer research, 2008

Abstract

UNLABELLED: THE AIM of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of S-1 to an oral combination regimen of tegafur and uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients were treated with either S-1 (80 mg/m2/d), administered for 28 days every 42 days, or UFT (300 mg/m2/d) and LV (90 mg/d), administered for 28 days every 35 days. The clinical results were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in overall response between the two patient groups. The overall response rate was 11.8% in the S-1 group, and 11.1% in the UFT/LV group. No statistically significant difference in-time- to progression (TTP) or survival time was observed between the treatments. The median survival time was 29 months with S-1 and 12 months with UFT/LV.

CONCLUSION: The oral S-1 provided similar safety and efficacy, compared to UFT/LV for metastatic CRC.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free