Evidence Hub

Real-world Outcomes of Trifluridine/Tipiracil With or Without Bevacizumab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Kawazoe T, Ando K, Ryujin K, Nambara S, Tsuda Y, Nakanoko T, Oki E, Yoshizumi T

Anticancer research, 2026

101 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) is an established treatment for refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and recent clinical trials have demonstrated improved survival with the addition of bevacizumab. However, real-world evidence regarding this combination therapy, particularly in patients previously treated with bevacizumab and its positioning in later-line treatment strategies, remains limited.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with mCRC treated with FTD/TPI with or without bevacizumab at our institution. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the two groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR). Subgroup analyses were performed according to prior bevacizumab exposure. Additionally, exploratory analyses were conducted to evaluate treatment sequencing with regorafenib.

RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included (FTD/TPI: n=42; FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab: n=59). The combination therapy was associated with significantly improved OS (HR=0.53, 95%CI=0.33-0.86, p=0.009) and PFS (HR=0.44, 95%CI=0.28-0.69, p<0.001). These associations remained significant in multivariate analyses. Subgroup analyses showed a consistent benefit of the combination therapy. In exploratory analyses, prior regorafenib use was associated with longer PFS (HR=0.32, p=0.002).

CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 101 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free