Evidence Hub

The Location Consistency Index Helps to Distinguish Eyes With Subclinical Keratoconus From Normal Eyes

Wang M, Shi C, Zhou Y, Ye Y, Fan X, Huang H, Yu X, Lu F et al.

Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995), 2022

252 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a novel index that combines the locations and magnitudes of corneal alterations to improve discrimination of eyes with subclinical keratoconus from normal eyes.

METHODS: A Scheimpflug-based tomography system was used to image 252 eyes (normal: 78 eyes, subclinical keratoconus: 71 eyes, and keratoconus: 103 eyes) of 252 patients from two clinical centers. Coordinates and magnitudes of the maximum corneal protrusion alterations were extracted from curvature, elevation, and pachymetry maps. A location consistency index (LCI) was calculated from the Euclidean distances among these locations. A logistic regression model, named the location consistency enhanced score (LCES), which combined the LCI and the magnitudes of these maximum alterations, was trained and tested in two different datasets.

RESULTS: The LCI in eyes with subclinical keratoconus was 7.8 ± 2.6 µm, which was significantly different from that in normal eyes (11.8 ± 3.9 µm) and eyes with keratoconus (5.8 ± 2.4 µm) (all P < .001). The LCI could differentiate eyes with subclinical keratoconus from normal eyes with a sensitivity of 67.6%, specificity of 83.3%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81. Combining the magnitudes of these maximum alterations with the LCI for the LCES yielded a sensitivity of 90.0% and a specificity of 74.4% for differentiating eyes with subclinical keratoconus from normal eyes (AUC: 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS: The LCI can assist in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 252 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free