Evidence Hub

Real-world adoption of off-label combinations for targeted therapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Battaglini J, AlDoughaim M, Li K, Patel J, Bhatt S, Everett P, Oxnard GR, Tapan U

Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2026

Abstract

PURPOSE: No targeted therapy combinations have achieved regulatory approval for the treatment of biomarker-positive resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Given the widespread availability of next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect resistance, we reviewed the real-world experience of using off-label targeted therapy combinations to treat advanced NSCLC at our academic safety-net hospital.

METHODS: Pharmacy records from the Hematology/Oncology Department at Boston Medical Center during the years 2017 to 2024 were reviewed. One hundred eleven patients received oral, targeted therapy during this time. Our study focused on those patients who received an off-label combination of targeted therapies for advanced NSCLC. We reviewed their demographics, treatment history, molecular data, and published evidence to support the combination.

RESULTS: Eight patients were treated with nine combination regimens. The median age was 69 years (age 29-89 years). Six patients had EGFR exon 19 deletions and two had EML4-ALK fusions. The nine combination regimens included addition of a MET inhibitor (n = 3), a RET inhibitor (n = 2), a MEK inhibitor (n = 2), an ALK inhibitor (n = 1), and an EGFR antibody (n = 1). The median duration of treatment was 7 months (range: 1-35 months), and was longest for alectinib and capmatinib (15 months ongoing and 25 months, ongoing) and gefitinib and selpercatinib (35 months, ongoing). Available supporting evidence included retrospective cohort studies…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free