Evidence Hub

Paediatric acute kidney injury induced by vancomycin monotherapy versus combined vancomycin and meropenem

Zhang T, Cheng H, Li Y, Dong YZ, Zhang Y, Cheng XL, Wang AM, Dong YL

Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics, 2019

243 participants

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Increasing reports of the combined use of vancomycin (VAN) and piperacillin/tazobactam leading to higher nephrotoxicity have led to carbapenems being recommended as an alternative option to combine with VAN when nephrotoxicity is a major concern. However, whether carbapenems also increase the nephrotoxicity of VAN is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether meropenem is a suitable drug to combine with VAN based on whether meropenem enhances the nephrotoxicity of VAN.

METHODS: This retrospective cohort study enrolled hospitalized children ranging in age from 1 month to 18 years at two tertiary hospitals from 1 February 2017 to 1 February 2018. Patients treated with either VAN or combined VAN and meropenem (VM) for more than 48 hours were eligible for inclusion. Those with underlying kidney diseases or abnormal age-adjusted baseline serum creatinine (SCr) at admission were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to the patients to balance factors associated with acute kidney injury (AKI). In addition, VAN trough concentrations were also compared. AKI was defined as an increase in SCr by ≥50% from baseline or by ≥0.3 mg/dL sustained over at least two consecutive measurements ranging from the time of initiation until 72 hours after the completion of VAN therapy.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The eligibility criteria were met by 183 of 243 identified patients: 101 patients received VAN alone and 82 received VM. PSM resulted in 154…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 243 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free