Evidence Hub

What is the impact of nutritional status on health-related quality of life in hemodialysis patients?

Han H, Burrowes JD, Houser R, Chung MC, Dwyer JT

Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation, 2012

89 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a nutrition-specific quality of life (NSQOL) questionnaire that combines the Appetite and Diet Assessment Tool and the Food Enjoyment in Dialysis tool, and to measure the association between nutritional status and both the NSQOL and the generic health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 89 hemodialysis patients. Nutritional status was measured by subjective global assessment and biochemical indices, including serum albumin concentration. Adequacy of dialysis was also measured. To determine the correlation between quality of life and nutritional status, both the NSQOL and the HRQOL instruments were used.

RESULTS: The mean NSQOL score for the entire cohort was 8.9 ± 4.5. The NSQOL was positively correlated with the mental component score (r = 0.52, P < .001) and the physical component score (PCS) (r = 0.29, P < .05) of the HRQOL questionnaire. There was no difference in the NSQOL score between the moderately malnourished and the mildly malnourished to well-nourished patients. The mean PCS was significantly lower in the moderately malnourished group as compared with the mildly malnourished and well-nourished groups (33.4 ± 10.7 vs. 38.9 ± 10.2, P < .05); however, there was no difference in the mean mental component score between the groups. Nutritional status, as assessed by subjective global assessment, was positively correlated with the PCS (r = 0.33, P < .05) and serum albumin concentration (r =…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 89 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free