Evidence Hub

Prescription Trends of Initial Pharmacotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Among Treatment-Naïve Patients in South Korea: A Retrospective Analysis

Kim YH, Je NK

Lower urinary tract symptoms, 2025

1,445,144 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common urological condition in aging men that causes lower urinary tract symptoms. Pharmacotherapy is central to BPH management; however, considering updated guidelines, recent prescription trends remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess initial pharmacotherapy trends in patients newly diagnosed with BPH.

METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used 2015-2020 data from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service to examine the trends and influencing factors of BPH drug utilization among South Korean patients aged ≥ 40 years with no prior history of BPH. Subgroup analyses were performed by categorizing patients into five age groups (40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, and ≥ 80 years) to evaluate age-specific prescription patterns.

RESULTS: Of the 1,445,144 patients newly diagnosed with BPH, 1,336,695 (92.4%) initiated treatment within 60 days of diagnosis. Among those treated, 54.9% received α-blocker (AB) monotherapy and 17.9% received 5α-reductase inhibitor (5-ARI)/AB combinations. Use of 5-ARI/AB combinations increased with age, from 8.0% in patients in their 40s to 25.4% in those aged ≥ 80 years. Tamsulosin (a selective AB), dutasteride (a 5-ARI), and mirabegron (a β3-agonist) were the most frequently prescribed agents.

CONCLUSION: Recent American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines recommend combination therapy as an effective strategy for reducing the risk of BPH-related complications. Although the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 1,445,144 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free