Evidence Hub

The definition and prevalence of pediatric psychotropic polypharmacy

Chen H, Patel A, Sherer J, Aparasu R

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2011

282,910 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Using increasingly stringent criteria, this study evaluated the prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy among children on the basis of duration of overlap between two or more psychotropic medications.

METHODS: The prevalence of psychotropic polypharmacy was defined as receiving ≥ 14 days, ≥ 30 days, ≥ 60 days, and ≥ 90 days of overlapping psychotropic prescription fills. Descriptive analysis was used to compare the prevalence findings on the basis of multistate Medicaid data involving children six to 18 years of age. A sensitivity analysis was also conducted to explore the extent to which the cross-sectional operational definitions of polypharmacy used in the published literature identified patients who were prescribed psychotropic combinations on a long-term basis.

RESULTS: The analysis revealed that 282,910 children had at least one psychotropic prescription fill in 2005. Of these patients, 28.8% received psychotropic combinations for at least 14 consecutive days. The observed rate of polypharmacy dropped to 27.2% with 30 days of overlap and to 20.9% with 60 days of overlap. Using a 60-day overlap in psychotropic drugs as a cutoff between short-term and long-term polypharmacy, analyses showed that 14%-46% of patients identified by cross-sectional definitions as receiving polypharmacy had likely received combination treatment on a temporary rather than on a long-term basis. In addition, cross-sectional definitions failed to identify 18%-44% of patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 282,910 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free