Evidence Hub

Anthropometric and pharmacotherapeutic variables on acute emesis induced by cisplatin-containing chemotherapy

Catalán Arlandis JL, Jiménez Torres NV

The Annals of pharmacotherapy, 2000

106 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the effects of anthropometric and pharmacotherapeutic variables on acute emesis induced by cisplatin-containing regimens with dosages > or =50 mg x m(-2).

METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional, noncontrolled study was performed to analyze acute vomiting during the first 24 hours in patients treated in a Spanish hospital. The patients received an intravenous combination of drugs (2 doses of metoclopramide 3 mg/kg, dexamethasone 20 mg) as first-choice antiemetic therapy. Intravenous ondansetron 8 mg and dexamethasone 20 mg served as an alternative regimen in patients <30 years old with a history of extrapyramidal manifestations or emesis in previous cycles. Therapeutic failure was used as a dependent variable, defined as three or more vomiting episodes documented by the patients. Other variables were the chemotherapeutic regimen; antiemetic regimen; patient gender, age, weight, and height; and cycle number. The reference logistic model and two reduced-models derived from the latter were designed. The logistic models were subsequently validated by means of receiving operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS: A total of 319 cycles involving 106 patients were studied. The metoclopramide regimen was administered in 66% of the cycles. The therapeutic failure rate was 21% for the metoclopramide regimen and 32% for the ondansetron treatment. The logistic model developed identified the type of chemotherapeutic regimen provided as the most significant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free