Evidence Hub

Pharmacological control of diabetes and hypertension comorbidity in the elderly: A study of "real world" data

Foguet-Boreu Q, Violán C, López Jiménez T, Pons-Vigués M, Rodríguez-Blanco T, Valderas JM, Guisado Clavero M, Pujol-Ribera E

Primary care diabetes, 2017

27,637 participants

Abstract

AIMS: The study aimed to determine which drug combinations achieve better control in comorbid diabetes and hypertension in a pragmatic sample of primary health care patients.

METHODS: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: 251 primary health care centres in Catalonia, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS: individuals ≥65 years old with a dual diagnosis of hypertension and diabetes.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: good control criteria were established as glycated haemoglobin ≤7% and blood pressure <140/90mmHg. Antihypertensive and hypoglycaemic drugs and treatment adherence were analysed in relation to their association with good control.

RESULTS: 27,637 patients (58.0% women) had hypertension and diabetes and met selection criteria. Mean age was 75.9 years (standard deviation [SD]: 6.7). Both diseases were well controlled simultaneously in 34.2% of patients. The combination of biguanides and diuretics achieved the highest association with good control. Adherence to pharmacological treatment was more difficult in diabetes than in hypertension. Lack of control was associated significantly with non-adherence to treatment, 0-12 PHC visits, obesity and increasing number of diabetes prescriptions.

CONCLUSIONS: Good control of diabetes and hypertension comorbidity with pharmacological treatment in elderly patients is challenging. Some drug combinations achieved better control than others. The greatest effort should focus on improving the low adherence to diabetes treatment.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 27,637 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free