Evidence Hub

Pupil dilation dynamics with an intracameral fixed combination of mydriatics and anesthetic during cataract surgery

Chiambaretta F, Pleyer U, Behndig A, Pisella PJ, Mertens E, Limao A, Fasce F, Fernandez J et al.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2018

591 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the pupil dynamics of an intracameral combination of 2 mydriatics and 1 anesthetic (Mydrane) to a standard topical regimen for cataract surgery.

SETTING: Sixty-two centers in Europe and 6 centers in Algeria.

DESIGN: Prospective case series.

METHODS: Pupil size measurements were performed in 2 randomized studies (phase 2 and phase 3) under masked conditions (recorded videography, masked reading center). The outcomes in the phase 2 study supported evaluation of the timeframe to obtain pupil dilation and the phase 3 study provided results on mydriasis stability.

RESULTS: Phase 2 and phase 3 comprised 139 patients and 591 patients, respectively. After intracameral combination administration, 95% of the pupil dilation was achieved within a mean of 28.6 seconds ± 4.6 (SD). At the beginning of capsulorhexis creation, the mean pupil diameter was larger than 7.0 mm in both groups. The intraoperative pupil diameter remained stable in the intracameral combination group and decreased in the topical group. The mean change in pupil size just before capsulorhexis to the end of surgery (just before cefuroxime injection) was -0.22 ± 0.72 mm and -1.67 ± 0.98 mm, respectively. No clinically significant change in pupil diameter (change <1.0 mm) occurred in the majority of the intracameral combination group (89.3%) compared with the topical group (26.8%).

CONCLUSIONS: Intracameral combination of 2 mydriatics and 1 anesthetic is an alternative to topical mydriatics for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 591 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free