Evidence Hub

Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors for second- or later-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xu W, Liao X, Wang K, Shi T

Translational lung cancer research, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Second- or later-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is highly individualized. Combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (multi-TKIs) has emerged as a chemotherapy-free option for these patients. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and safety of the treatment.

METHODS: We systematically searched four databases for studies evaluating ICIs combined with multi-TKIs in second- or later-line therapy for NSCLC. Data were extracted and study quality was assessed using the Canadian Institute of Health Economics tool for case series. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted for efficacy outcomes.

RESULTS: Twenty studies (10 prospective and 10 retrospective) were included from 155 retrieved articles. Nineteen studies were conducted in China, with programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1) antibodies and anlotinib as the most frequently used combination. The single-arm meta-analysis showed that the pooled median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.74 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.65-6.84], and the median overall survival was 15.41 months (95% CI: 13.40-17.41). The objective response rate was 26.35% (95% CI: 19.52-33.18%), and the disease control rate was about 80.73% (95% CI: 75.59-85.86%). For patients with EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutations, the mPFS was 3.17 months (95% CI: 2.54-3.79). The most commonly reported severe adverse events across the included…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free