Evidence Hub

Exploring the feasibility of combining transcutaneous electrical spinal cord stimulation and overground robotic exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation in patients with spinal cord injury

Algaba-Vidoy M, Pérez-Nombela S, Megía-García Á, Montero-Pardo C, Redondo-Galán C, de Los Reyes-Guzmán A, Serrano-Muñoz D, Gómez-Soriano J et al.

Frontiers in neurology, 2025

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a traumatic condition that causes severe sensory and mobility impairments, including gait dysfunction. Combining exoskeleton-assisted gait training (EGT) with transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) may enhance motor recovery in SCI patients. This study explores the feasibility and immediate effects of combining these two neurorehabilitation strategies, without pursuing clinical benefits.

METHODS: We present a 3-of-1 case series of incomplete SCI patients (AIS C-D) who participated in two walking sessions: tSCS-assisted gait, then combined with the robotic exoskeleton Exo-H3. Each session included three phases of 3 min each: before, during and after tSCS. Surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded to analyze muscle activation and the level of effort generated using root mean square (RMS) and integrated EMG (iEMG). Functional outcomes were assessed with the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for discomfort and fatigue and distance covered.

RESULTS: Immediate effects varied among patients. Participant 1 showed increased muscle activation and effort without the Exo-H3 after tSCS, particularly in the Rectus Femoris (ReFe) muscle, along with improved TUG performance and walking speed. However, during the combined tSCS-Exo session, muscle activation did not decrease, but effort was significantly reduced, masking the tSCS effects seen without the exoskeleton. Walking speed and TUG also worsened. Participant 2…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free