Evidence Hub

Combination laparoscopy and nephrolithotomy technique in the same session in patients with complete staghorn stones and poor performance status: case series in a single center with long-term follow-up

Wu B, Bai S, Liu X

World journal of urology, 2022

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The management of complete staghorn stones remains a challenge for urologists, owing to the high stone burden, low stone free rate, and high rate of complications. Hence, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of a technique involving combination laparoscopy and nephrolithotomy in the same session in patient with complete staghorn stones and poor performance status.

METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated seven patients with complete staghorn stones who underwent a combination of laparoscopy and nephrolithotomy in the same session in our center between December 2016 and October 2019. The surgical technique was as follows. Through a four-port transperitoneal laparoscopic approach, the kidney was mobilized after complete dissection of the renal pedicle. The renal pelvis was then incised with a cold scalpel. A nephroscope was inserted into the renal collecting system through both a laparoscopic port and the renal pelvis incision. This method enabled visualization of and access to almost all calyces for clearing the stones from the affected kidneys in a hand-assisted manner which a hand was inserted in the peritoneal cavity. The outcome data included the stone-free rate, short-term and long-term complication rates, and stone recurrence rate.

RESULTS: The stone free rate was 85.70% (6/7). No patients had sepsis or required blood transfusion perioperatively, and no major short-term complications occurred. After 24.00 (15.00, 48.00) months' follow-up, no patients had long-term…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free