Evidence Hub

Conservative Mucogingival Management of External Cervical Root Resorption Using Bioceramic Repair Materials: A Case Series

Sforza F, Cerutti F, Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Scarano A, Qorri E, Romano R, Pedullà E et al.

The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry, 2025

Abstract

AIMS: To document the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a conservative mucogingival surgical protocol-combining coronally advanced flap, defect debridement, bioceramic repair material, and connective tissue graft-in the management of external cervical root resorption, with emphasis on soft-tissue stability, esthetics, and pulp vitality preservation.

METHODS: Ten patients with external cervical root resorption diagnosed by cone-beam computed tomography were classified according to Patel's three-dimensional system. Treatment involved a coronally advanced flap, defect debridement, application of bioceramic material to repair the defect, and a connective tissue graft. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were monitored over a three-year follow-up period.

RESULTS: All treated teeth remained functional and asymptomatic after three years. The protocol preserved soft-tissue esthetics with minimal gingival recession. Pulp vitality was maintained in eight cases, likely related to the biocompatibility of the bioceramic material.

CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this case series, the combined surgical approach appeared to be associated with favorable clinical outcomes, including maintenance of tooth vitality, soft-tissue stability, and satisfactory esthetics. These preliminary findings should be interpreted cautiously and confirmed in controlled clinical studies.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free