Evidence Hub

Conversion therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma following complete response to transarterial radioembolization combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab

Popovic P, Kalamutova A, Djokic M, Cuderman A, Boltezar G, Trotovsek B

Radiology and oncology, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The current Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification recommends systemic treatment with atezolizumab and bevacizumab as the first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recent studies suggest that combining systemic immunotherapy with locoregional treatments, such as transarterial radioembolization (TARE), may enhance immune responses and improve overall treatment outcomes. This article presents a case series of three patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who were treated with transarterial radioembolization followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab achieving conversion to surgical resection.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2020 and April 2024, three patients with advanced HCC were treated with TARE followed by atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The cohort included: Patient 1: A 59-year-old female, with noncirrhotic liver, with a 12 cm tumor and a 1.5 cm satellite lesion located in the liver, with hepatic vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombosis (Vv3 Japanese classification) and a small lung metastasis. Patient 2: A 63-year-old male with chronic hepatitis C (CHV), presenting with a 10 cm tumor and portal vein tumor thrombosis (Vp4 Japanese classification). Patient 3: A 50-year-old male, with non-cirrhotic liver, with a 17 cm tumor with portal vein and IVC tumor thrombosis (Vp3, Vv3 Japanese classification).

RESULTS: The combined treatment approach enabled surgical resection in all three patients, each achieving a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free