Evidence Hub

Biliary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam in a case series of orthotopic liver transplant recipients

Gatti M, Rinaldi M, Laici C, Ambretti S, Siniscalchi A, Viale P, Pea F

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the biliary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam in a series of critical orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients having pre-emptive therapy during OLT because of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) rectal colonization or targeted therapy of CPE intra-abdominal (IAIs) and/or biliary tract infections (BTIs).

METHODS: We performed an exploratory, hypothesis-generating prospective case series including critical OLT recipients carrying a Kehr's tube and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftazidime and avibactam in both bile and plasma simultaneously while receiving CI ceftazidime-avibactam pre-emptive or targeted therapy. Biliary aggressive joint PK/PD target attainment [defined as a free ceftazidime steady-state concentrations fCss/MIC ratio >4 coupled with an avibactam fCss/target concentration (CT = 4 mg/L) ratio >1] was selected as optimal threshold of ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy, given this was previously shown to be independently associated with lower rates of microbiological failure and resistance development. Bile-to-plasma fCss ratios were calculated.

RESULTS: Overall, four critical OLT recipients were included. Aggressive biliary ceftazidime-avibactam joint PK/PD target during treatment with CI 2 g/0.5 g q8 h over 8 h was attained in 2/4 cases (quasi-optimal and suboptimal in one case each). Median (range) fCss bile-to-plasma ratios were 0.28 (0.22-0.38) for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free