Evidence Hub

Successful treatment of ventriculitis caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae with i.v. ceftazidime-avibactam and intrathecal amikacin

Gofman N, To K, Whitman M, Garcia-Morales E

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2018

Abstract

PURPOSE: A patient with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection is described, and treatment options are discussed.

SUMMARY: Few antibiotics to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection are available, and treatment is further complicated by the limited ability of many antibiotics to penetrate into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Currently, there is a lack of clinical data on the treatment of central nervous system CRE infections, and therapy is based on case reports, case series, and small retrospective studies. A patient was admitted to the emergency department with intracranial hemorrhage and ventriculitis due to traumatic injury. A ventriculostomy and, subsequently, a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt were placed. After approximately a month of treatment with various antibiotic regimens, the patient's VP shunt was externalized, and a CSF culture speciated carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The patient was then switched to i.v. ceftazidime-avibactam and intrathecal amikacin therapy. His CSF cultures were sterile 3 days after initiation of those antibiotics, and subsequent CSF cultures resulted in no growth. After the patient was treated with intrathecal amikacin 30 mg daily for 4 weeks and i.v. ceftazidime-avibactam 2.5 g every 8 hours for 6 weeks, the ventriculitis resolved, the external ventricular drain was removed, and he was transferred to a long-term care facility for rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION: A man with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free