Evidence Hub

Prolactinoma course and management in transgender women: case report and systematic review

Jentus MM, Pelsma I, van Trigt VR, Bakker L, Pouwels MJ, van Furth W, Verstegen M, Morreau H et al.

European journal of endocrinology, 2026

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prolactinomas are the most common functioning pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs). In transgender women, gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) usually combines high doses of estrogen and anti-androgen therapy, both of which can elevate serum prolactin levels. Whether GAHT influences tumor behavior in patients with pre-existing prolactinomas remains unclear.

DESIGN AND METHODS: Case report illustrating the clinical challenges in managing a prolactinoma in the context of GAHT initiation, combined with a systematic review of all published cases and available guidelines of GAHT in the prolactinoma context.

RESULTS: A 22-year-old female (46,XY; assigned male at birth) with untreated gender dysphoria and hypogonadism was diagnosed with a macroprolactinoma (39.9 mm; serum prolactin 285 × upper limit of normal (ULN)). Cabergoline therapy reduced prolactin levels to 27.3 × ULN within one year. Pituitary apoplexy with acute visual field and acuity deterioration required emergency transsphenoidal debulking. Two months postoperatively, prolactin levels were 8.6 × ULN with total hypopituitarism and small irresectable remnants. Initiation of estrogen therapy led to unexpected biochemical (128.4 × ULN) and radiological progression despite cabergoline reintroduction and dose escalation, necessitating estrogen withdrawal to stabilize the disease. Subsequent radiotherapy allowed safe estrogen reintroduction. To date, 24 prolactinomas in transgender women (including this…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free