Evidence Hub

A case of advanced gastric cancer which became operable after chemotherapy with combination of TS-1/CDDP and in which complete disappearance of liver metastasis was histopathologically confirmed

Meguro E, Kaizuka H, Inaba T, Irinoda T, Hayakawa Y, Okada S, Yamaguchi S, Wakabayashi J

Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2003

Abstract

We encountered a patient in whom TS-1/cisplatin (CDDP) combination chemotherapy was effective. The cancer became operable, and complete disappearance of liver metastasis was histopathologically confirmed. The patient was a 65-year-old man who presented with complaints of epigastric discomfort and anorexia. Based on upper GI endoscopy and abdominal CT, type 1 gastric cancer associated with liver and abdominal lymph node metastases was diagnosed. The cancer was judged to be inoperable, and chemotherapy with a combination of TS-1 and CDDP was initiated. One course of treatment consisted of administration of 120 mg/day of TS-1 for 21 days followed by 14 days of withdrawal, and administration of 100 mg/body/day of CDDP on day 8 (80 mg/body/day in the second course). After two courses of treatment, the primary lesion and the liver and lymph node metastatic lesions decreased in size (reduction ratios were 42.3%, 90.5% and 85.2%, respectively). The tumor marker values became normal. Subsequently, the cancer was judged to have become operable. After consultation with the patient, total gastrectomy, splenectomy, partial hepatectomy, and D3 dissection were performed, and curability B was achieved. The only adverse event of Grade 2 or more severity observed during drug administration was anorexia. Liver metastasis was judged from pathological findings to have disappeared. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged from the hospital. To date, there have been…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free