Evidence Hub

Combinations of maternal serum markers to predict preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth: a systematic review

Hui D, Okun N, Murphy K, Kingdom J, Uleryk E, Shah PS

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC, 2012

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Abnormal serum screening markers have been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. We sought to review the performance of combined abnormal first and/or second trimester maternal serum markers used in prenatal screening for aneuploidy and open neural tube defects for predicting preeclampsia (PET), small for gestational age (SGA), and stillbirth beyond 24 weeks' gestation.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies from 1970 to May 2010 that analyzed predictive abilities of combined serum markers for defined outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted independently by two authors, and 15 studies were included. Eight studies of 115,290 pregnancies, 11 studies of 144 853 pregnancies, and seven studies of 80 274 pregnancies examined PET, SGA, and stillbirth respectively. Because of the heterogeneity of marker combinations and thresholds, outcome definitions, and analytic methods, limited meta-analysis was possible for the outcomes of PET and SGA only. Three relatively homogeneous studies on prediction of PET, and two on prediction of SGA were meta-analyzed. Several single studies demonstrated utility in combining markers to predict adverse outcome; however, this effect was not confirmed after meta-analysis. The most common combination of markers evaluated was alpha fetoprotein and human chorionic gonadotrophin for all outcomes. The highest positive likelihood ratios for predicting…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free