Setting quality specifications for the future with newer approaches to defining uncertainty in laboratory medicine
Abstract
When describing the performance of procedures and the reliability of their results, ISO terminology should be used. Results should be universally comparable and this requires metrological traceability. The concomitant uncertainty (inversely) indicating reliability should be obtained in a universal and transparent fashion, and should be combinable. Therefore, the approach of the "Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement", leading to a result without known bias and a combined standard uncertainty, has advantages over the allowable total error concept, incorporating procedural bias.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Combining in silico and in vitro approaches to identification of potent inhibitor against phospholipase A2 (PLA2)
- In silico and in vitro studies: investigating the chemical composition, DFT, molecular docking, and dynamic simulation of Satureja candidissima (Munby) Briq essential oil as a potential antibacterial agent
- Quercetin combined with ciprofloxacin and gentamicin inhibits biofilm formation and virulence in Staphylococcus aureus
- In silico study of the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of some N-methylanthranilates and their analogs
- Anticonvulsant Effects of Citronellal, Daidzin, and Phytol, Possibly Through GABAA Receptor and Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Interaction Pathways: In Vivo and In Silico Studies
- 2-Phenylcyclopropylmethylamine (PCPMA) Derivatives as D3R-Selective Ligands for 3D-QSAR, Docking and Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.