Evidence Hub

Utility of contrast-enhanced MRI radiomics features combined with clinical indicators for predicting induction chemotherapy response in primary central nervous system lymphoma

Wang X, Zhao L, Wang S, Zhao X, Chen L, Sun X, Liu Y, Liu J et al.

Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024

131 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of combining contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) radiomics features with clinical variables in predicting the response to induction chemotherapy (IC) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).

METHODS: A total of 131 patients with PCNSL (101 in the training set and 30 in the testing set) who had undergone contrast-enhanced MRI scans were retrospectively analyzed. Pyradiomics was utilized to extract radiomics features, and the clinical variables of the patients were gathered. Radiomics prediction models were developed using different combinations of feature selection methods and machine learning models, and the best combination was ultimately chosen. We screened clinical variables associated with treatment outcomes and developed clinical prediction models. The predictive performance of radiomics model, clinical model, and combined model, which integrates the best radiomics model and clinical characteristics, was independently assessed and compared using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS: In total, we extracted 1598 features. The best radiomics model we selected as the best utilized T-test and Recursive Feature Elimination (RFE) for feature selection and logistic regression for model building. Serum Interleukin 2 Receptor (IL-2R) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Score were utilized to develop a clinical predictive model for assessing the response to induction chemotherapy. The results…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 131 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free