Evidence Hub

Dramatic reduction of clindamycin serum concentration in staphylococcal osteoarticular infection patients treated with the oral clindamycin-rifampicin combination

Bernard A, Kermarrec G, Parize P, Caruba T, Bouvet A, Mainardi JL, Sabatier B, Nich C

The Journal of infection, 2015

24 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Pharmacokinetics of clindamycin in combination with rifampicin or levofloxacin were prospectively evaluated for the oral treatment of severe staphylococcal osteo articular infections.

METHODS: Thirty-four patients (25 males, 9 females), with a mean age of 52.4 ± 17 years (range, 24-81 years), were randomly assigned either to the clindamycin-rifampicin or to the clindamycin-levofloxacin arm (control), following surgical debridement and intravenous adapted treatment. Trough and peak serum concentrations of clindamycin were measured at day-1 (D1), D15 and D30 of oral treatment. Cure was evaluated at a minimum of one year after the initiation of treatment.

RESULTS: The oral treatment was interrupted in 4 cases because of adverse events. Mean trough and peak serum concentrations of clindamycin in the clindamycin-rifampicin arm were lower than in the clindamycin-levofloxacin arm during the time of oral antibiotic regimen (0.79 ± 0.3 μg/ml vs 4.7 ± 1.2 μg/ml, p < 0.001, and 3.48 ± 1.1 μg/ml vs 10.2 ± 1.8 μg/ml, p < 0.001, respectively). A consistent decrease in clindamycin serum concentration was observed at each time-point of follow-up. At a mean of 23 ± 7.8 months (range, 12-47 months), 24 patients were available for clinical evaluation. No difference could be detected in the cure rates between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a significant influence of rifampicin on clindamycin pharmacokinetics using the oral route. Clindamycin serum concentrations…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 24 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free