Evidence Hub

Microbiological Screening of Hypothermic Preserved Donor Corneas in Keratoplasty

Li S, Zhong J, Tan Y, Deng Y, Huang H, Wang B, Peng L, Zhang H et al.

Current eye research, 2019

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the prevalence, risk factors and microbial profiles of donor corneal contamination and its association with postoperative infection. Materials and Methods: 1348 hypothermic preserved donor corneas were screened during keratoplasty to assess the impacts of donor age, gender, cause of death and corneal preservation time on the contamination risk. The microbial spectrum and antibiotic sensitivity of causative microorganisms and the prognostic role of corneoscleral rim cultures were analyzed. Results: 111 donor corneas (8.2%) had positive microbial cultures, with 84 contaminated by bacteria, 25 by fungi and 2 by both. Acinetobacter baumannii complex (19.8%) and Candida spp. (9.0%) were the most commonly isolated bacteria and fungi, respectively. Two patients (1.8%) who received contaminated corneal buttons developed postoperative infections. Death due to cardiac disease led to more corneal contaminations than death due to brain disease (odds ratio (OR) = 2.59, P = .009). Longer preservation time was associated with a trend toward increasing contamination rate (from 8.3% to 15.0%). Moreover, fungal-contaminated corneas were preserved longer than bacterial-contaminated corneas (6.6 ± 4.5 versus 10.2 ± 5.4 days, P = .001). Corneas from donors who died from cardiac diseases and trauma showed the highest prevalence of bacterial (10.9%) and fungal (2.6%) contamination, respectively. Antibiotic sensitivity testing revealed that the third-generation fluoroquinolone…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free