Evidence Hub

Various clinical presentations of tuberculosis in heart transplant recipients

Chou NK, Liu LT, Ko WJ, Hsu RB, Chen YS, Yu HY, Chi NH, Chang SC et al.

Transplantation proceedings, 2004

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to clarify the various clinical presentations, incidence, and complications associated with tuberculosis (TB), as well as patient survival in heart transplantation (HTx) recipients. A retrospective review of 177 case records of HTx recipients from May 1989 to April 2003 were evaluated for their clinical course, diagnostic procedures, treatment, and survival. TB was diagnosed by culture. TB was proven in five (2.8%) patients. There were three pulmonary lesions and two extrapulmonary lesions. TB was diagnosed at 3.5 to 85 months after HTx. Pulmonary lesions were detected by cultures of sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, or pleural effusion. For extrapulmonay lesions, one subject had neck lymphadenopathy shown by biopsy and culture to be TB; another suffered from swelling of the finger joints which upon culture of the aspirate proved to be TB. Treatment consisted of isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol, pyrazinamide, streptomycin (STR), ciprofloxacin (Ciproxin), and levofloxacin (Cravit). During the use of RIF, the daily dosage of cyclosporine (CsA) or tacrolimus was increased to maintain appropriate levels. Because of severe hepatotoxicity and interference with CsA, RIF was withdrawn and STR given in the last three patients. In addition, ciprofloxacin was given in the patient with miliary TB. Levofloxacin was given to the other two patients. All patients survived the TB infection under treatment with at least three drugs. There were five…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free